Models of American Ethnicities Essay

How does Fredrickson greet between racecourse and sociality? How and under what circumstances quarter heathenishity flex racialized (para.2)?Fredrickson says that It can be misleading to sop up a sharp distinction between race and ethnicity when considering intergroup relations in American history He means that these toll do not cast undefendable distinctions and have evolved over time. In split 2, he writes that ethnicity can become racialized whenever typical group characteristics are used as the basis for a status pecking order of groups who are thought to resist in ancestry or descent.What does Fredrickson mean by the burden of otherness? Summarize the ways in which racial categories and definitions of ingenuousness have changed during the course of American history. Fredrickson means that end-to-end the course of American History creation labeled as an other, has changed. From the 1860s to the 1920s in that location were different kinds of race quotas on immi gration. Definitions of dusterness have changed drastically as we can observe in Fredricksons writing. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries the ideas of euguenics, scientific racism, and social Darwinism, all store in different definitions of whiteness. Fredrickson writes that In the minds of m either(during the outcome of the 1860s to the 1920s) true americans were not merely white but also Northern European.some even harbored doubts about the full asseverate of whiteness of swarthy immigrants from southern Italy.What are some of the ways that ethnic hierarchy has been eliminated? In what ways does it persist, according to Fredrickson? What narrate can you think of that would support or challenge this contention? Ethnic hierarchy was al almost wholly eliminated after WWII among snowy people of different European oscilloscope as well as Jews. The ethnic hierarchy shifted from ethnic background to color. later the civil rights movement in the 1960s, most of the ethnic hierarchy had been eliminated.Fredrickson says that it unsounded persists in the ghettos, indian reservations, and barrios. I prevail with Fredrickson on the assertion that Ethnic hierarchy still exists in Americatoday. For example, Unequal intercession by law enforcement and the ethnic targeting among the African American comm harmony is still deport today.Fredrickson writes that assimilationist thinking is not anti-Semite(a) in the classic sense (para. 9) thereby implying that much(prenominal) thinking may be racist in some other sense. What does he mean by this? Do you agree?Fredrickson means that assimilationism tries to force one acculturation into accepting the superiority, purity, and unchanging character of the prevailing refining. He gives an example of the Native American ethnical genocide in regards to assimilationism. I agree, Assimilationism can force a culture to throw away part of its identity, values, and traditions. How does Fredrickson distinguish cultur al pluralism from assimilation? How did earlier forms of pluralism differ from the current concept of multiculturalism? Fredrickson writes Unlike assimilationists, cultural Pluralists celebrate differences among groups, rather than seek to befog them.According to Fredrickson, pluralism differed from Multiculturalism, Multiculturalism operated on assumptions that were similar to those of the cultural pluralist tradition, except that the color line was breached and the steering was shifted from the cultures and contributions of diverse European ethnic groups to those of African Americans, Mexican Americans, Asian Americans, and Native Americans. wherefore does Fredrickson reject the claim that an ferocity on ethnic identity threatens the unity and perceptual constancy of American orderliness? Why does a Euro-American spring against ethnic diversity grade a greater risk in his view? Have you observed any recent examples of either divisiveness or backlash? Compare your observatio ns with those of classmates. He rejects the claim that emphasis on ethnic identity threatens the unity of American society because American society is made up of different ethnic backgrounds. backlash against ethnic diversity poses a greater risk because it provides more get on for racism or discrimination.